Skip to main content

Will Spidey Still Be Here Years From Now?

Yes. Yes, he will be. How do I know this? He's remained popular for over 40 years. He started out as a comic book character and while he's still a character in comics, many people recognize Spidey in other forms of media, like the movies and cartoons. The wall-crawler is a cash cow for selling merchandise. Pencils, coffee mugs, bed sheets, shoes; I honestly can't think of anything Spidey hasn't appeared on. To think he'd suddenly fall off the face of the Earth is ludicrous.

But something Joe Q said has me thinking that Marvel is concerned about the long term status of Spider-Man. Joe said this months ago and I'm not gonna post a direct link for a number of reasons: A. I'm too lazy. B. I really can't stomach digging for exact quotes from the man because after reading a five part interview with him about One More Day, I've had all the Joe Q I can stand. C. Enough people know how Joe Q works so you shouldn't have any reason to believe I'm putting words into his mouth. I'm going to paraphrase what Joe said.

"Its my job to make sure Spider-Man stays fresh for every fan that comes in the door and keep him that way for the next generation."

Joe Q said something to that effect. One side of my brain says that's a load of poppycock, but the rational side of my brain says he probably does believe in preserving the iconic status of Spidey in the comics. He's probably got good intentions, but hey, the road to Hell is also paved with good intentions.

I'm well aware of all the good stuff Joey has done for Marvel. Brought them out of bankruptcy, allowed for more trade paper back books to be published, getting more money to roll Marvel's way. From a business standpoint, Joe Q may be the best EiC Marvel has ever had. However, I really don't think Joe or anyone else at Marvel needs to worry about making sure Spidey sticks around (pun kinda intentional). As I already said, he's been here for over 40 years. No matter how bad they screw up the comics, Amazing Spider-Man will not be canceled and Spidey will not suddenly vanish.

I'd really like to stay away from the Brand New Day mess in this blog entry, but when talking about keeping Spidey "fresh", it's hard not to bring it up. Everything was done in OMD and BND was done to preserve the appeal of Spider-Man. He was made single again, he works at the Bugle again, and he once again has a string of near endless bad luck. That may sound like the good old days, but it really isn't keeping the character fresh, and the execution of the stories is actually a lot worse the era the writers are trying to emulate. Joe thinks Spidey works best stuck doing the same old, same old. Marvel's desire to keep Spidey vital is actually hurting the character more than anything else.

Personally, I think Joe Q and many others at Marvel have their priorities out of whack when it comes to Spidey. What Marvel needs to do is not focus on keeping Spidey fresh, but set their sights on telling good stories. Oh, sure someone will say "But they are focused on telling good stories!" Are they? Have you heard what Marvel says at comic cons and in interviews? There's so much talk about keeping Spidey "young" "fresh" that Marvel can't see the forest for the trees. When your character has been around for four decades, YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT KEEPING HIM FRESH! Have faith in the character and the writers to tell good stories. Spidey was still around during the Clone Saga and the debacle that was the '98 reboot. If the Earth is still here for another 40 years, Spidey will be here another 40 years. He isn't going anywhere no matter how badly Marvel mucks him up with their good intentions.

Comments

Tommy said…
Perhaps the odd thing with this keeping fresh stuff, is that I got into the book when Pete was just married.

I'm thinking things are getting skewed when 'fresh' means selling out the character's concepts and stepping backwards in a big way.


I think they need to keep sight of what makes Spidey work instead of making things too hackneyed with problems, mess-ups, etc.

Those things only work when they are not so blatantly bad. And knowing there is history, is what makes any current woes that much more painful to look at.

In all honesty, Marvel should habitually make something like Marvel Adventures to have a Spidey they can present without any specific history, and if they write him right, people will then seek out other Spidey-titles, and they, the consumer, can make their choice.


Otherwise, every single fan will at some point be incensed by what happens. New readers that don't care about continuity, but stick with things long enough, will eventually feel what they didn't before.


I'm thinking what Marvel will want to think about, is making sure 'Marvel time' is slow enough to not have their characters age 60 or higher, hehehe.

I think things will be weird in 2099 if they try to move the Marvel Universe into that time period instead of it being around the end of 20th Century/Beg. of the 21st due to how 2099's premise worked, with the Heroic Age originally ending about the end of 20th Century, but due to the events of Spidey meets Spidey 2099, that date was never firmly set.
Well said, Tommy. You should fire that off in an e-mail to Marvel.
Tommy said…
Sounds like a plan. I'll do that.

Popular posts from this blog

Super Hero Secret IDs & Their Friends

I've always felt Clark Kent has had one of the poorest disguises of all time for a secret Identity. All he does is straight up his "S" curl so it isn't visible and put on some glasses. Well, also depending on the era, Clark is either goes out of his way to be a bumbling idiot so people don't suspect he's an alien from another world, or here's the non-clumsy modern version. Personally, I like both, but if Lois is indeed a star reporter then she'd have to see through that disguise. Let's be realistic here. No one is that clumsy unless they are trying to be. I actually read a post on a message board that Lois finding out that Clark was Superman takes away from the whole dynamic. Seriously? The dynamic of making Lois look like a complete idiot who is unable to see what is right in front of her? I didn't miss that one bit. In fact, one of the few problems I had with Superman The Animated Series is that Warner Brothers didn't allow the creators t

Hooray for Reprints!

The Green Goblin has often been touted as Spider-Man's deadliest foe. He is what the Joker is to Batman. I wonder if Stan knew back when Gobby first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man #14 that the Goblin would become the menace that he is to Spidey today. What makes the Goblin such an interesting foe isn't the costume. No. Much like Spider-Man, Gobby is such a great villain because the man underneath the suit is fascinating. Norman Osborn is one effed up dude to say the least. He was so annoyed with Spider Man getting in his way that he the battle between the two of them personal. He discovered Spidey's secret ID, revealed his own identity to the wall-crawler and would later go on to make Spidey's life a living nightmare. Gobby not only screws up Spidey's life, he screws up the lives of those Spidey cares about like Flash Thompson or if your name is Gwen Stacy, thinks ain't lookin' too good for you. I've read every early Spidey/Gobby story except one and it

Marvel Wants to Hear From YOU!

In the letter page of Amazing Spider-Man #565, Spidey editor Steve Wacker filled the page with nothing but negative letters from readers that hate Brand New Day. Who says Marvel doesn't listen to the fans? And what's more, Mr. Wacker has even asked us to write in and tell them how we feel. Can you believe that? It takes class to run nothing but angry letters and a couple of those to the right are pretty nasty. My mother actually suggested I write to the editor and state my feelings on the molestation of Spider-Man in ASM. I'd been meaning to write them, but I just never sat down to do so. With the editor of the Spidey books kindly saying that the letter's page is "the place to vent," I think the time has finally come for me to express myself. I don't know if it will get printed since I've stopped reading ASM, but if they take my letter and many others that are outraged by BND to heart, then that's all that matters. Dear ASM Staff, Do you know what